Moto tag (4-Pack)

Work really well, first time using tags like these but so far the only Keys I've lost are the ones I didn't put a tag on. Also good to put in a car to help find it is a carpark. So far battery life seems good.

Not cheap but work well and great peace of mind

Whilst these do work, the software is functionally very lacking. The app has minimal information and links to the Android app "Find My Device". However when selecting the find option from the Moto Tag app the tag doesn't display in the list of devices available. To access the tag it's necessary to go into Bluetooth and under saved devices select settings on the device which has been tagged, and chose "Find device" from there. Once this is done any other tagged device also appears. That said, it at least shows where your car/cycle/other expensive item is provided someone is close by with an Android mobile. And we find one useful for tracking our car so that when one of us is away from home we can check where they are on the journey back. The hundred pound price for four was good though.

Completely refuse to pair with Pixel 7 Pro so therefore utterly useless to me. Returned

The thing itself works fine if you've lost your keys somewhere in the house/car etc - ie within earshot. The Google 'find my device' network is a bit limited, especially outside of cities. It really only works well where there's a good density of android phones with the relevant settings turned on. That being the case, if you want to find something that's been stolen, you're probably out of luck.

I wanted to like these, but the Moto Tag is not ready for prime time. It looks the part, but once you try to actually use it, the cracks show immediately, both in functionality and execution. 1. “Find My Device” support is partial and inconsistent Despite advertising support for Google’s Find My Device network (aka “Find Hub”), the tags don’t appear on Google’s web-based Find My Device portal, only in the app. They also require you to mark them as "lost" before they start passively reporting location via the Android network unlike AirTags where you can always check for when last 'seen'. I found that feature in AirTags especially useful as you could check you car's location at any time. 2. Poor UX and app design Setup seems smooth at first, but firmware updates don’t happen automatically. You have to manually open the Moto Tag app, tap on each device, check the version, and update it. The tag should update firmware on first registration. The app offers little feedback and almost no proactive prompts, you're left guessing whether tracking is even working. 3. Passive tracking is deeply flawed Compared to AirTags, these fall miles short. Apple’s tags passively report location via iPhones everywhere. These do nothing unless explicitly marked “lost.” Even in “lost” mode, location updates are slow or non-existent in real-world tests, clearly due to low adoption of Find Hub on Android devices. 4. No web management You can’t manage or even view the tags via Google’s Find My Device website, meaning you’re locked into the phone app, with no backup if your phone is unavailable or has been stolen. 5. Misleading value for money Near £100 for four tags is tolerable, IF they worked like AirTags. As it stands, you’re paying a premium for half the features and a third of the reliability. The one saving grace: decent hardware, the build quality feels solid. The tag design is unobtrusive, and battery replacement is easy. But none of that matters if the software ecosystem behind it doesn’t deliver. Maybe they've been hobbled by Apple's patents, but until Google and Motorola radically improve the software, network density, and usability, this product is best avoided if you care about actually finding your things.

To the best of my knowledge, the Moto tag is currently the only tracker tag for the "Find Hub" platform on Android that has UWB support for close-range direction-finding, for use with phones that also have UWB support. This makes the Moto tag far superior than other Android trackers for actually finding stuff. The Moto tag is physically the same size and shape as the Apple AirTag, which means that it fits into any AirTag accessory, of which there is already a large range.

Bad product out of 4 tags, only 1 managed to be successful. Having difficulty connecting to moto tag and also having difficulty having connected to find my hub. Tried many solutions to fix it 1) reset WiFi and Bluetooth. 2) clear cache 3) reddit forums Still didn't work. Go look through the forums and you will see lots of people going through the same problem. Do not buy until both companies Google and Motorola get their things together

Llego antes de lo esperado y en buen estado, el producto es de buena calidad y quede satisfecho con su sonido

Look, it's handsome, affordable, and simple. Pros: - It's an excellent value for what you actually get, typically priced around $100-$150. - It's relatively waterproof and low profile for sleeping. - There are a TON of workout options, I believe they claim 100. Curiously, there are numerous yoga workout options, yet no "Rucking" or "Circuit" training. If you're in the police or military, this complicates your calculated calorie burn. - It takes your blood oxygen, stress, heart rate, steps, sleep, and other health data. - The battery is long (on paper). Motorola SAYS you get 16 days of battery life. This is true only if you implement every battery-saving feature possible and use your watch as little as possible. If, like me, you use your watch frequently (two workouts a day, six days a week; sleep health data), expect to get about 5-6 days of battery life out of it. That's still really good! It's just not 16 days. - If you have a Motorola phone, there is seamless integration; you just download the Moto Watch app. - The Moto Watch app does not have any in-app purchases; it's an all-in-one fitness and watch app and is GREAT. - The Moto Watch app, I have heard, is available for Apple and Samsung products, which means there is an affordable option for those users. - The Moto watch app is very intuitive and minimalistic. You have a lot of control over your watch and settings, yet it's never overwhelming, unlike with Samsung Health and Google Fit. Cons: - You don't receive your phone notifications on your watch, or at least I have yet to figure out how. I don't understand why this would be the case when everything else integrates so painlessly. - The Bluetooth connection is relatively short, around 35-40 feet. There is a "Swim" workout option on the watch, good luck using that if you have a large pool and are constantly disconnecting from your phone. - While the UI is smooth, the screen fidelity and refresh rate are relatively low compared to other smart watches, even from 6 years ago, like the Galaxy Active 2 from 2019. - No GPS tracking. This is a problem. There are cheaper smart watches with GPS tracking. It's genuinely baffling that there is a fitness watch without it. In fact, if you are a serious runner and consider this a deal breaker, I can't blame you. - The Moto Watch app drastically overestimates burned calories for any given workout. I compared identical workouts using Google Fit, Samsung Health, and Moto Watch. The former two were close, yet Motorola's health app drastically overestimates calories burned by a magnitude of 20-33% TL;DR: It's good yet has some drawbacks. For the price, I highly recommend the watch; however, if you require GPS tracking, consider looking elsewhere.

Nunca funcionaron, se conectan y desconectan a los minutos, intenté soluciones de internet y nada

Operating system is locked down, so it limits what you can do with it, but it's insane battery life compensates for that. Basic smart watch, gets the job done, and for less than the competitors. Does all the essentials.