Gardens of the Moon

his is a book that I've been wanting to review for ages. In fact, in some ways, Erikson was the genesis of this here blog. I've been writing about fantasy since I was in highschool. My Junior Year Position Paper was on C.S. Lewis. The next year, my paper was on the genre as a whole. But after voraciously devouring this series and its genre busting all-out action, I knew things had changed in the genre as a whole. I stopped reading fantasy in college. I started dating, made friends, and basically didn't have the time. Years later, bartending in New York, and living in Harlem I had a lot of time to myself again, and I started to reread some of the classics on my shelf. I had no interest in new fantasy. I figured the genre had gone to Forgotten Realms and DragonLance knock offs. Erikson made me a believer again. I've tried to turn people on to this book, and this series, to no avail. And not to "Norms" (non-fantasy readers) to bonafide sword-swinging fantasy lovers. This series is so good I had to take notes while reading it again so I'd remember all the ideas within that I'd wanted to explore. So I'm going to abandon the usual format. The format, afterall, is intended to provoke critical thought. Kalam, Quick Ben, Whiskeyjack First of all, Gardens of the Moon, though the first in the series, The Malazan Book of the Fallen, is an intermission. I think this may be why so many people have trouble getting into it. It starts after a massive battle, after an emperor was assasinated, after a city has fallen. Much of the book is getting the characters from the remains of one city to the next on the new Empress hit list. There are other reasons of course. The scope of this world is enormous. That's one of the fantasy five, and Erikson gets full marks. His world is enormous and intricate. This is not surprising. He and a friend developed the world as a game a la Dungeons and Dragons. It should also be noted that Erikson (his pen name) was an anthropologist. As someone who is married (yes! as of a months ago) to an anthropologist, I know just how much is crammed into their heads. Each people of this world is intricate and fully developed straight out of the gate. Another reason why this is an intermission is because Erikson wastes little time on explanation. Single, dense phrases are used to describe entire peoples. And there are literally over two hundred of them, from the plains dwellers on Genabackis, the Rhivi, to the denizens of the Seven Cities, to the Gral, to the fishing people of Quon Tali, the sophisticated Daru, and the imperially minded Malazans. All those names are confusing, and that turns a lot of people off. It is very easy to miss important details, things that occur, pivotal moments described in a single sentence, and moved on only to be referred to again and again with no explanation. Still the important thing to remember when reading this epic, is that you don't always need to pay attention to these names. This series is a series to re-read, to parse, to explore. Get what you can, and have faith that Erikson will explain further in due time. It might take to the seventh volume of the series, but he has never contradicted himself that I can see, so be patient and keep reading. The really good stuff doesn't even occur until the third volume, Memories of Ice. Anomander Rake - Son of Darkness Before I get further into my notes, let's hit some of the basics. Like in Jordan's works, there are literally hundreds of characters, so this is a plot driven story. That said, given the sheer number of words in over ten volumes, many characters emerge extremely well developed. The story starts with a character named Gannoes Paran, he's young, good looking, and you expect him to be the story's main hero. Not so, because there is no main hero. This is an ensemble cast, and there half a dozen main characters at least. There is an evil empire, the Malazan Empire, which isn't really that evil, or much of an empire it turns out. But none of the soldiers of that Empire are evil, they're just men, and this is, among other things, a soldier's novel, about companionship, and loyalty in the ranks. But the Empire is the backdrop for something much much larger, which is really only hinted at in the first book, and in fact, is not even given a name to in the first of the series. Another thing that's great about the series is the magic system. One of the Fantasy Five, magic. It's completely unexplained in the first book, but it's astonishing. The book opens with a battle between a planet sized asteroid hovering hundreds of feet in the air, and five arch-mages sending corruscating waves of power into the sky. The typical magic cliche for fantasy is -- the big stuff doesn't play until the end. Until then, its all parlor tricks and smokescreens. Another cliche ripped to pieces Ok, so onto the nitty-gritty. This is a discussion for Moon readers. So stop now if you haven't read the book. Adjunct Lorn. Why did she have to die? I rather liked the character of the stern, attractive, warrior woman, and thought she would have made a better partner to Gannoes. The reason I ask is because Erikson indeed revives characters with impunity, having killed Gannoes in the first 50 pages, Tattersail and sending Toc the Younger off into a mysterious chaos warren. Lorn was a fascinating character with a fascinating weapon, her Ottatoral sword. But then again, Erikson refers to himself as a cliche breaker, and having Gannoes end up falling for the fat mage Tattersail, is a real change of pace for any genre, much less fantasy. Hedge and Fiddler, Bridgeburners One of the central mysteries of the first book is the assassination of the old Emperor. Who did it? Why? Is the Emperor really dead, and what about his cronies, are they dead too, like Toc the Elder, or Daseem Ultor? It's an interesting frame for the series. Many of these questions don't even get answered in Moon, but are answered in the sequel Deadhouse Gates, and in many ways the entire series strives to answer these questions. Along the same lines, is the idea that the Bridgeburners, the seminal unit of the Malazan Army that is known far and wide must also die. I regret this, there are only about seven of them left to begin with, and they all seem to be great characters. Still, the series is called the Malazan Book of the Fallen, and if Malazans didn't fall, well, what would be the point? Next topic: The Deck of Dragons. So Erikson takes the game of Tarot and makes it real. It's an unbelievably clever mechanism for the story, it adds a ton of depth, and a ton of detail. However, it does make the story denser and harder for the lite-fantasist to glom onto. The Deck of Dragons is a playing deck of all the gods and demi-gods in the saga's pantheon. They're organized into aligned houses, and unaligned houses. And when characters like Tattersail give a reading, it often reveals what Gods are at play in the field. All the houses, and the players in each deck are noted at the beginning of the first book. This cheat is not repeated in later books. Another very divergent aspect of Erikson's work is his quixotic narrators. Calling them narrators is a bit misleading, they are characters, who often speak in riddles, or long nearly non-sensical rants that seldom make sense to the other players, but which are more often directed at the reader. Each book has such a character, but the one in Gardens is none other than Kruppe. Kruppe is a fat, balding little wizard who is a master thief, and we find out during the book, quite a powerful mage. However, his persona is one of befuddlement and misdirection, and even his greatest friends seldom realize that their actions and thoughts are directed entirely by the mischievous Kruppe. This fat wizard also provides the book with its greatest sense of comic relief. These narrative voices are almost always comedic and poke fun at both the author, and his characters. You get a sense of the author himself, or at least, who the author might like to be, as these characters, in addition to being funny, are almost always really good natured as well. This is another aspect which deserves exploration: Erikson is a master of good and evil. It sounds trite, and I'm sure that he would prefer to think of himself as a trend breaker, but fantasy is about good and evil, Gods of Dark, Swords of Light. In this Erikson doesn't break the trend, he masters it. You may recall from a prior review of Naruto, that the character of the young Ninja is extremely good, happy, kind, and despite his idiocy, his heart is warm and caring for all. The good--in the Erikson novels--is similar. However, Gardens of the Moon, is less of an exploration of good and evil than his later novels. Still you get flashes of it through characters like Kruppe and his companions, Gannoes love for Tattersail, Tattersail's heartwrenching guilt about previous monstrosities committed under imperial writ. Ok, just a few last points: There are many characters, including the "hero" Gannoes, and the anti-hero Lorn, who are forced continually to sublimate their will. They act for the good of the empire, of which they are committed agents. Sergeant Whiskeyjack of the Bridgeburners who is offered the chance to retire, flee certain death because of his love and loyalty of his comrades, and their own love for him. This sublimation of the will, can be seen as character building, but it also exerts an exceedingly destructive force. When Lorn finds out that Tattersail was the agent responsible for atrocities committed in Malaz City, the girl, shorn of her previous life, reemerges from her imperial shell, the illustrious general Dujek Onearm reminds her of her current responsibilities, and that she herself is the second in command to none other than the woman who commanded the purge. Of course, these events are all historical, past events that are mere artifacts to the story, but the sheer depth is staggering. And I'm in love with it. I want to unearth the entire history of this continent that goes back over two-hundred thousand years. Penultimate point: Dragnipur. How cool is that? A massively powered sword, that itself harbors a magical realm of pain and imprisonment, where a massive cart is pulled by a single Atlas like godling. Ultimate point: Erikson stories as we'll discover are all about convergence. This I think qualifies as a cliche, but Erikson is the first that I've read to be so open about it. Jordan's books use the same cliche, the Wheel of Time books always end with a convergence. So what does this mean? A convergence is a meeting of fell powers, the climax of every story, where all the pivotal characters meet for their hour of greatest conflict. What makes Erikson's convergences so remarkable? The sheer scope of the powers involved. Even now, I recall vividly the ending of the Sword of Shannara, and the half-elf Shea's meeting with the evil wizard. Those powers were great and scary, buy Shea was a quiet, hobbit like character with no real power's of his own. As a brief aside, Japanese horror movies, and anime is very similar, and in fact may be the progenitor for this sort of convergence. The powers that meet are colossal, far greater than human, far greater than mere wizard or swordman. The forces that converge in an Erikson novel are titanic in nature. And astonishing. As an aspiring author, it makes me weep with jealousy. The depths of horror, the depths of love, the depths of friendship and loyalty, seem to be unsurpassable. So. If you can get through all the names, if you can get through all the lands and peoples and characters, if you can look beyond the things you don't yet know, and enjoy it for what it is, the rewards are entirely worth it. Buy this book. Note: I intend to add photos to this soon, so check back! [...]

this book got under my skin. it took me two times to read it. the first attempt, i was lost around a quarter of the way in and just couldn't continue. i'd given up in frustration, so lost. someone said to me that erikson likes to throw the reader into the deep end; to me it was more being dropped into a raging sea. i floundered, reaching for the expected features of a fantasy novel and as i failed to touch them, i was adrift. i'd put the book aside, bought a new kindle fantasy novel and tried to move on, only to find my thoughts returning to gardens of the moon, wondering. as complex and confusing as it as, it had piqued my interest. i picked it up again. it isn't an easy read at all. the first half of the novel jumps from one scene to another, crowds of characters are introduced, leaving the reader puzzling over how it fit together. there were a lot of moments when i stopped, trying to remember who a character was or what was being talked about. conversations centred on magic or history that has yet to be explained are intimidating. fantasy books that infodump can irritate me and erikson is the extreme opposite- he tells the reader _nothing_ at all. you have to pick up the threads, pay attention, slowly weave together a complete story. it was difficult, slogging through chapters, sorting out scenes, until, somehow, just over halfway through i realised that this is an incredible book. as it came together, i sat breathless, eyes flicking to my battery level, hoping i wouldn't run out of power before the end of the next chapter. this book needs to be judged as a whole. the start is rough. it is confusing, frustrating, at times almost nonsensical. this is a book requiring stamina, stubborness from a reader. if you endure and battle through, the novel will reward your efforts. there are definite flaws. by the end i could have called a rollcall of characters, rattling off their names, but i knew very little about them. there was so little insight into character. i didn't really _like_ any of the characters. i didn't know them well enough to judge them. characters were more roles than people- they were there to perform a function. at times, telling them apart was so hard. almost all characters spoke in the same way, making them hard to differentiate in conversation. i was reading the kindle edition and didn't realise that there was a full cast list at the end. i got through without it and managed but i think that quick reference could have made it easier to know who was who. when i'd finished, i felt satisfaction equal to the amount of energy i'd put into the reading. this isn't a perfect book but when i was done, my first thought was to pick up the next in the series. i'm not sure if the writing style can last for multiple volumes but still it is there, under my skin, that need to puzzle and struggle through even more just to see where the complex concept is really leading me. i will be reading more of erikson.

After years spent gathering dust on my bookshelf, GARDENS OF THE MOON finally found its way onto my nightstand, having fought through piles of work-related and leisure reading materials. A friend of mine had strongly recommended the series three or four years ago, and after the nice hardcover copy that I had immediately ordered arrived, it unfortunately became stalled in my ever-churning heap of books-to-read. Still, this one has been on my radar as a highly-anticipated epic adventure. Always being prominent in real-life bookstores, as well as here on Amazon, the Malazan Book of the Fallen series has long evoked a sense of postponed gratification and anxiety over my limited reading time. The covers of the books alone promised a dark, fierce, and gritty fantasy that I assumed would take after Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire . My friend's descriptions included phrases like "mind-blowing", "awesome", and "Freaking insanely bad-ass". Well, the wait is over, and I've begun my journey through Erikson's massive saga. And I am very happy to report that the writing, story, and setting are every bit as good as I had hoped. The most striking aspect of GARDENS OF THE MOON is that Steven Erikson has absolutely no care for the reader's comfort, dropping you right into the middle of a complicated story that is already well underway. Character motivations are rarely explained, a vast setting is suddenly exposed but not explored, a huge and confusing cast of characters from all manner of races is introduced with very little guidance, and mysteries abound in magic, lore, and history. The general feeling during the first half of the book is one of confusion, where you'll feel like you must be missing key information, as every character seems to know more about what is going on than the reader. You'll find yourself trying hard to remember many details, with the hope that you'll finally be able to get a grasp on what is behind the intense and deadly story. While this aspect may sound frustrating, and many reviewers have docked stars from this book's rating, I found the abrupt entry into this world exciting and fun. Knowing that there are huge pieces to the story that haven't been revealed, straining your brain to remember snippets of history, and pondering over the nature of the never-explained Warrens (the source of magic in the series), all gave this book a real and gritty feeling. It was like I had been suddenly transported to this new and mysterious world without the benefit of an introduction. Erikson's intentional refusal to hold the reader's hand might sound off-putting, but I found it refreshingly unique. The story itself, which has only begun to unfold with GARDENS OF THE MOON, is incredible. Vast empires, rebel armies, powerful sorcerers, and unearthly beings vie for power in a violent and quickly moving plot that will keep you on the edge of your seat. The magic is very much in-your-face compared to most dark epic fantasies. Battling wizards lead to wholesale destruction, animated puppets and talking war-hounds stretch the imagination, and so-called gods interfering with mortal concerns calls for expecting the unexpected. The setting is absolutely jam-packed with all manner of new races, human-like and not, living and undead, mortal and immortal. Wonderfully imagined characters fill the pages of GARDENS OF THE MOON, with names like Whiskeyjack, Quick Ben, and Anomander Rake. You get the feeling that most of their stories have already been told, but that this newest adventure will be the most desperate and thrilling yet. Other characters like Crokus, Paran, and Sorry take on the mantle of the young would-be heroes just starting on their hopeful, yet disillusioned, adventures. This series tells an incredibly large story that I am excited to have finally begun, and can hardly wait to continue with Deadhouse Gates . GARDENS OF THE MOON reminded me of why I love to read epic fantasies, and it made me glad to know that there are still wholly original stories to discover in a field of so many excellent and prolific authors. Very highly recommended!

I'll preface this by saying I've read the entire series. I stuck through the whole thing right until the conclusion. What did I find? I found an incredible world unparalleled in scope. I found characters who lived and breathed. I found emotion that few books are able to evoke. I also found confusion. I'll start off with the bad. This entire series is convoluted and nigh impossible to understand in one go. Nothing is explained in this series. Everything just is. I read 10 books of this stuff and I still could not even truly begin to explain to you how the magic system works, and I promise you the magic system is very prevalent in the series. Then you have plotlines. I lack the words to describe how horrid the structure of this novel is. If you think of a normal epic as having many plotlines which weave together to form a beautiful tapestry, you'll best understand the Malazan series as a tangled mess with no shape and some of the strings strewn about on the side. Things happen and they don't make sense. The ending of the series is beautiful but at the same time is nothing. A character we haven't heard from in two books does something across the world with no foreshadowing whatsoever and it has a major effect on the end of the story. This doesn't make sense and it's a bit disappointing. That said, the good. The story is good. It may be a tangled mess, but it is one beautiful tangled mess. Once you finally find your feet you will enjoy where the story takes you. I think this is mainly due to the characters. Some of them are hit and miss, but when Erikson hits, it's a home run. I truly cared about many of the characters and reading about them was a blast. Some of them are misses, but this is rare. This is a series you'll truly have to work for. If you want casual reading then stay away. Don't buy this book because you'll hate it. You have to really want this series to be good and you have to put in the effort. I do not mean reading 100-200 pages, I mean reading 1000 pages before things start jumping out. I thought the entire series was pretty mediocre or even bad until I got to the third book, easily 1500 pages into the series. If you're willing to strive to be enveloped in the world, I'd be hard-pressed to find a better fantasy series and I've read quite a few. There is a masterpiece here if you can find it.

Gardens of the Moon (Malazan Book of the Fallen) is the first book in a ten book series called The Malazan Book of the Fallen. The series is arguably the most epic in scope, the most complex in narrative style, and the most detailed in terms of cultural, sociological and religious aspects. Comparisons to other great fantasy epics will no doubt include The Lord of the Rings: 50th Anniversary, One Vol. Edition or A Game of Thrones (A Song of Ice and Fire, Book 1) or even The Wheel of Time, Boxed Set I, Books 1-3: The Eye of the World, The Great Hunt, The Dragon Reborn ...but a better and more accurate comparison may be to Frank Herbert's magnificent sci-fi masterpiece, the Dune (40th Anniversary Edition) (Dune Chronicles, Book 1) chronicles, and Glen Cook's gritty and character-centric fantasy series The Black Company (Chronicles of The Black Company #1) . Gardens of the Moon (Malazan Book of the Fallen) starts off much like Dune (40th Anniversary Edition) (Dune Chronicles, Book 1) and The Black Company (Chronicles of The Black Company #1) , in that you are literally thrown into the middle of this fully realized world, replete with an ancient but still living prehistory (in the form of the T'lan Imass and the Jaghut), a powerful but aloof alien species (in the form of the Tiste Andii), and a host of elder gods who are anything but passive and who routinely interfere and direct the lives of the general populace. I remember when i was a teenager and I had heard of a movie called Dune which was apparently based upon a best-selling novel. The premise intrigued me to the point where I read the book and then immediately saw the movie by David Lynch. I did not see the movie alone. I took my cousin with me. My female cousin who knew nothing of sci-fi or fantasy and who probably was looking for a movie like Gremlins or Ghostbusters, rather than a strange sci-fantasy like Dune. And the movie was incredibly strange. If i had not read the book...i don't think even I would have been able to pick up on all of the subtle nuances and grand scope of things without having read the book first. I can't imagine what it must have been like for my poor cousin, who was so confused and befuddled afterwards that all she could do was ask "What is the 'water of life'? and why did he keep saying 'the sleeper has awakened'?" I recount this story only to illustrate a potential problem point: readers who are looking for the standard/typical mode of fantasy storytelling which have become so predictable that many times we're not looking for diversity in narrative, but rather looking at what type of new "power" is being contested or won. No, Gardens of the Moon will be as baffling and mysterious and potentially frustrating for many readers who are looking for something straightforward and simple to explain. Such is not the case with this series. Steven Erikson has created a complex and living breathing world and populated with various races and cultures and countries and thrown them into this story. And what is the story? It's hard to say really. There are so many narrative plot points. But I think the fundamental story is that something happened thousands of years before, something so terrible and cataclysmic that the repercussions of the event have reverberated throughout history, affecting the elder races and which have now culminated into a series of devastating and world-ending consequences that the modern races and their current use of magic must now contend with the here and now. I having been reading this series for the past few years now, and am on the last few novels. These books are not easy to read, but they yield so much pleasure in terms of epic storytelling and the range of characters. I will point out two things that you may need to know about the entire series: First, Steven Erikson believes that all characters, big and small, matter. You might agree with that viewpoint, but if you think about what that really means, it means that each and every little character gets their share of the page, meaning what would normally be a 400 page book could turn into a 1,000 page book because the lives and dreams of each and every character is detailed and told. hence the massive length of most of Erikson's books. Second, Steven Erikson's prose style is almost as complex and flowery as his story and settings. This prose is as purple as purple can get. He tends to wax poetic and philosophically on things and may even meander here and there, but the beauty of the series is in the details. And my god, there are some details. Details that you may think aren't much when you first encounter them, but then you realize how they contribute to the overall understanding and appreciation of the entire story. But with that said, these books are marvelous. And if you can get through the first book, as dense and complex as it is, then you will be rewarded by the 2nd and 3rd books, Deadhouse Gates (The Malazan Book of the Fallen, Book 2) and Memories of Ice (The Malazan Book of the Fallen, Book 3), which are about as good as anything i've ever read. The book Deadhouse Gates (The Malazan Book of the Fallen, Book 2) will break your heart with its grueling story about Coltaine's Chain of Dogs. And Memories of Ice will astound you in its scope and power; it is perhaps Erikson's one Masterpiece, though some may argue that the entire series is what constitutes his masterwork. but if one were to give the word masterpiece to any one of his novels, it would probably have to be Memories of Ice. But in order to get there, you have to go through Gardens of the Moon (Malazan Book of the Fallen), which is not his best work, but the beginning of his greatest work.

The first thing I'll say is that I probably would have stopped reading this novel after a couple hundred pages except for two things: 1. Many reviews here mentioned it's slow going and confusing at first, but picks up near the end. 2. I'd actually read the prologue of the third book in the series (Memories of Ice) first, and had been blown away by the writing and imagery. In the end, I'm glad that I continued reading, but I'm going to start with my dislikes because I want to end this review on a positive note. The book as a whole is somewhat confusing initially because the author throws a huge amount of names at the reader. Places are given little 'context' and a large cast of characters is introduced quite quickly. For awhile, each chapter or couple of chapters then introduce more places and more characters. It is not easy to keep all of it straight. Sometimes the reader is left to wonder what a word means when referencing a character. ie, there's one specific case where one character notices another, but the word used to describe the new character could be anything from the character's name, his rank, or even his race. Erikson is also not particularly good about describing the non-human races. I'm a believer that mannerisms or descriptions of non-human races shouldn't be the focus of every sentence in which they speak or act, but I do think that a description to fix their 'look and feel' in the mind of the reader should be done fairly quickly, and Erikson often doesn't include any of this until well after a race is mentioned for the first time. His descriptions of battle scenes can be quite confusing in this book. Plus, I was left wondering why the two sides shown in the beginning needed such huge 'traditional' armies when magic more or less trumped them the way a nuclear bomb would trump a World War II army. I have begun re-reading this series, and the scene I'm referring to stuck out even more. I'm not sure the soldiers in the huge army brought to assault a fortress were ever described as doing anything more than dying under incredibly powerful waves of magic. It was obvious the mages in the assaulting group were expecting something along those lines... so why would you even bring the army in close until after the mages got done with their jobs? I suspect the answer is because Erikson wanted to show how powerful magic could be in his world, but it still didn't make much sense. The characters are pretty stereotypical in most cases, and there really isn't much fleshing out of them as time goes on. This, by the way appears to be the case through at least the third book in the series. If a character changes, it's usually because of an outside influence that forces the change, not due to any real character development (there are a couple of exceptions). The final thing that I didn't really like was that the characters often seemed to be behaving more like "Dungeons and Dragons" roleplaying parties rather than real people. There were times when it literally felt like I was reading multiple D&D adventures rather than a coherent novel. So what did I like about the book? The first thing is that it's part of a much better series than this first novel would indicate. Without giving much away, many of the characters in this novel have significant backstories and depth that only becomes revealed in the later novels. I liked that the world was dark and felt reasonably realistic for a magic heavy novel. It focuses a great deal on politics and war, and generally does a good job. The magic itself, while mechanically confusing initially (and it gets better explained later in the series) is quite interesting. Even though Erikson's ability to introduce an intensely evocative scene isn't at full strength in this novel, there are hints of it from time to time when you can almost see an epic image or sequence in your mind's eye as if it were on a movie screen. I know I haven't given much of a synopsis of the novel itself, and the main reason is that I finished it over a year ago. While I remember specific scenes in great detail, the overall flow and plot of the novel eludes me. This isn't really a negative knock, as I have this problem with a great many books, but my impression is the plot does meander and take awhile to actually get anywhere. Still, if you have the time and patience to get through what really feels like a prologue to the rest of the series, I think it's worth it. I might recommend that you do what I did and pick up "Memories of Ice" in a bookstore, and read the prologue. If it hooks you, I think you'll find the build up worth it. While I gave the book '3 stars' (and this isn't one of those cases where it's really 3 1/2 stars to me), the series up through 3 1/2 books is closer to 4 - 4 1/2 stars.

(I wrote the following in response to a discussion topic question below, and since I hadn't even written a review yet, decided to copy it here as it says what I feel about this book and it's sequels. The question was from someone who had read the first 50 pages and wanted spoilers to decide whether to continue.) Felt that way about the first few pages also, and put it down a couple times to read other books, like Roger Zelazny's Amber Series and John Scalzi's Old Man's War trilogy. Amber is up there, for me, with Tolkein. Before I finally read Gardens of the Moon, my next faves were George RR Martin's Song of Fire and Ice series, and of course Robert Jordan's first three Wheel of Time books. Well, I'm now in book 6 of The Malazan Book of the Fallen series, just 2 months after reading Gardens of the Moon, and it's the best fantasy series I have ever read. It just gets better with every book. New stuff in each but the main story carries on, as do the main characters. The books' cover pages, with people like Stephen Donaldson comparing Steven Erikson to Tolkein, are not exaggerations. Plus the books are 1000+ pages, and he's written 9 or 10 now. An epic fantasy lover's dream come true. And again, every book gets even better than the previous. Do yourself a favor. If you like the books by the great authors mentioned above, you must read Gardens of the Moon. The characters you have been introduced to in the first 50 pages will be around from now on. So much happens to them, you won't believe. If you've read about the Hounds decimating the Malazan troops outside of Pale, I'm surprised you are not hooked already. The seemingly bad guys who control the hounds and take the girl are actually good guys in a very complex way, and it's very surprising who they really are. The girl is a major character for the entire series. Most characters take a book off while Erikson enters another area of the complex world and introduces new ones, but they all interact at some point in the incredibly sweeping panorama. This is all a developing saga that while complex, all ties in. It's a book about wars between mortals but with the immortals and almost-immortals playing the most prominent roles. Erikson's character development is unparalleled. The action is non-stop. The sorcery is more prominent and stronger than you've ever read before, yet the ordinary mortals are the most interesting characters. Gods walk among the living. Demons are friends as well as foes. The humor is laugh out loud funny at times. The shock of the violent death of a favorite character, that you never thought would die, will really get to you. Erikson is like Martin in that sense, but you really like Erikson's characters, versus ambivalence for many of Martin's. More specific spoilers? No, won't go there. If you have read Patrick Rothfuss' Name of the Wind and liked it, as I really did, you will love The Gardens of the Moon and the sequels, known collectively as The Malazan Book of the Fallen.

I started Gardens of the Moon off a recommendation from some friends a few years back, and ordered (I believe) the first three books all at once. I decided to jump in whole hog and get into this world that everyone else had gotten into. Well, I started reading Gardens of the Moon, and ... sheesh. I thought I'd thrown that money down the drain. I had a hell of a time getting into it, but pressed on. This is a dense, dense novel, with dozens of characters, a confusing plot, terms I didn't understand, and a shaky sense that *something* is going on, if only I could figure out *what*. In short, starting Gardens of the Moon is a bit like being thrown into the deep end when you barely know how to swim. Erikson's not an author who takes it easy on the reader. There are very few expository sections or "info-dumping" conversations between characters where they discuss stuff they already know very well in order to convey information to you, the reader. No; he throws you into the Malazan world head-first, and expects you to tread water and figure out what's going on. (For example, I don't think he explains what a "warren" is until maybe the sixth or seventh book out of 10, by which time the reader probably has figured out a lot on their own.) There aren't too many throwaway lines or passages, either; incidental stuff can (and does) become important later on. It's not a book you can skim... Well, you *can*, but you'll probably hate every minute. Erikson said in an interview that he writes novels as if they were short stories, and IMO, they almost need to be read with that same sensibility. Anyway! I made it through that first read, and even mostly enjoyed it. I even thought I was starting to figure it out, too. By the time I finished reading Deadhouse Gates, I was hooked. Back then, right after the first read, I probably would have given Gardens of the Moon three or so stars. It had some really interesting ideas (such as a neat take on, "what would someone who'd lived three hundred thousand years think like?") but that was about it. It was funny in parts, grim and others, but generally felt rather arbitrary and random. The reason I'm giving this book five stars *now* is largely what I consider the most amazing part of the series. It's intensely, astonishingly richer on a second, third, or - heck! - fourth read, after digesting later installments. On each re-read, it gives you some new perspectives... It's almost like a new book again. That apparent arbitrariness and randomness? Well, it all makes logical sense, too, after you get a few books into the series, to the point where you can say, "Well, yeah, I could have seen THAT coming." I can't say that about too many other books I've read. The Malazan series has its critics, and I can't really say they're *wrong.* It takes a certain sort of person to enjoy these, and Erikson does have his faults as an author. But, for my money, this series is about as good as epic fantasy gets. It's high fantasy pulled down to earth.

I can understand why some people may struggle with this book and I did at first but eventually I got the hang of it. It takes a lot of effort to remember everybody's names and stuff like that. I went to the Malazan wiki a lot when I would forget a name but you have to be very careful about spoilers. Give this book a shot but just be prepared to do your homework as well. Some people say that they don't fall in love with the characters and that's why they don't like the book but the characters are actually very good, it may just take a little more work for you to fall in love with them if that makes sense. The book isn't all fantasy either, it is actually more like a half fantasy half murder mystery, freaking masterpiece!! Apparently the next books are even better but we'll see you'll have to wait for my next review. One difficult thing about this book and also the next book too which I've started some of, the names here are brilliant but can also be very challenging. You don't know how you're supposed to pronounce the names but that's also what's so fun about these books too. I think just pronounce them however you would like to and don't try and force yourself to pronounce one way or the other, do a mixture of both. Just whatever feels right in the moment, that's what I was doing. Anyway great book and you should definitely read if you like fantasy or murder mystery type books. 10/10 for me.

A very good read, first is very difficult to follow because the author does not explain very much the background or what is going on, but this does not last very long once you have advanced a little in the book. There are a lot of unique characters, and how they interact is the best part

Por leer, pero me han comentado que es una excelente saga y no hay nada que te vaya a decepcionar. Estoy por empezarlo.

Amazing book

Gardens of the Moon ist der phänomenale Auftakt zu Steven Eriksons zehnbändigen Epos "A Tale of the Malazan Book of the fallen". Das mächtige Malazan Empire versucht den Kontinent Genabackis zu erobern. Nach dem Fall von Pale steht seinen Armeen nur noch eine freie Stadt, Darujhistan, und die Tiste Andii Armee unter der Führung von Caladan Brood im Wege. Doch ist Darujhistan erst eimal gefallen, so wird auch die Armee von Caladan Brood fallen, so glaubt Empress Laseen, die Regentin des Malazan Empires. Deshalb schickt sie die Eliteeinheit des ehemaligen Herrschers, die Bridgeburner, und den jungen Captain Paran nach Darujhistan, um den Weg zu ebnen. Doch dagegen haben nicht nur die Machthaber der Stadt etwas, sondern auch der mysteriöse Anomander Rake, Lord der Tiste Andii und Herscher über Moonspawn, einer fliegenden Festung. Zu all diesen Wirren kommen zu allem Übel auch noch mehrere Götter, die ihre ganz eigenen Ziele verfolgen... Oft wird an Steven Eriksons Saga die Komplexität und Schwierigkeit der Handlung bemängelt. Zugegeben: man muss sich erst reinfinden. Ich war zuerst auch vollkommen verwirrt, gerade wegen der vielen Rassen, Stämme und Organisationen (wer waren jetzt gleich noch mal die Crimson Guard und auf wessen Seite stand die? :-)). Aber man findet sich rein in diese Welt des Krieges und der Zwietracht, man muss nur am Ball bleiben und das wirklich ausführliche Dramatis Personae und Magie-, Ort- und Rassenerklärungen im Anhang zu Rate ziehen. Auch wenn bereits Handlungsstränge gelegt werden, die erst in viel späteren Bänden aufgeklärt oder gelöst werden, es lohnt sich wirklich, nicht entmutigen lassen! Aber nicht nur die genaustens durchdachte Geschichte fesselt hierbei den Leser, sondern auch der brilliante Schreibstil von Steven Erikson: er schafft es auf der einen Seite die Gräuel des Krieges mit einer derart düsteren Stimmung einzufangen, dass man beim Lesen ganz beklommen und betroffen wird, auf der anderen Seite kann schon in der nächsten Szene ein durchaus amüsantes Wortgefecht folgen. Mit unvergleichlichem Charme füllt der Autor seine Seiten, ich habe die englische Fassung nicht nur gelesen, um mein Englisch aufzupolieren, sondern weil ich persönlich die deutschen Übersetzung grauenvoll finde, die sich leider meiner Meinung nach durch einen Mangel an Gefühl negativ auszeichnet und zum großen Teil einfach lieblos wörtlich übersezt wurde oder mit einem Hang zu ungewöhnlichen, schlichtweg heute meist nicht gebräuchlichen Wörtern (s.u.). Auch wenn die englische Ausgabe durchaus schwierig zu lesen ist, kann ich den Leuten, die des Englischen mächtig sind, von der deutschen Fassung nur abraten (hinzu kommt, dass die Bücher nach dem ersten Band im deutschen in je zwei Bücher geteilt wurden, so dass man letztendlich doppelt so viel zahlt als bei den englischen Büchern (englisch: 10 Bände, deutsch: voraussichtlich 19), denn man gewöhnt sich an das große Vokabular, dessen sich Steven Erikson bedient. Gerade diese Vielfalt an Worten lässt das Geschehen wirklich zum Greifen nahe erscheinen, als stünde man direkt neben der gerade handelnden Person... Dies ist ein weitere Pluspunkt für den Autor: ich habe noch keine Geschichte mit so vielen so gut ausgearbeiteten Charakteren erlebt, die auch völlig unterschiedlich sind: so sind sowohl Kalam Mekhar als auch Rallick Nom Assassinen, ähneln in Charakter und Auftreten tun sie sich deswegen noch lange nicht, wie dies sicherlich in vielen anderen Fantasygeschichten der Fall wäre. Es fällt einem unter einer so großen Auswahl an sympatischen Charakteren wirklich schwer einen Lieblingscharakter zu benennen. Mir fallen spontan immer mindestens vier ein, nach kurzem Nachdenken muss ich diese Liste aber drastisch erweitern. Ebenfalls erstaunlich ist, dass einem eine schwarz-weiß Einteilung der Protagonisten wie bei "Der Herr der Ringe" sehr schwer fallen dürfte. Sowohl auf der Seite des Empires, als auch in Darujhistan gibt es Sympathen und Unsympathen, jeder hat seine Gründe für seine Ideale, Vorstellungen, Gewohnheiten, Handlungsweisen etc. einzustehen. Gerade deswegen trifft es einen um so mehr, wenn einer der liebgewonnenen Charaktere stirbt. Und dies ist eine weitere erstaunliche Tatsache: Steven Erikson hat keine Angst, seine Charaktere einfach sterben zu lassen, obwohl er sie so gut ausgearbeitet hat und bestimmt einiges an Arbeit drinnsteckt. Im Krieg überleben nun mal nicht alle, das ist einfach realistisch... Alles in allem war die sechsjährige (!) Vorbereitungszeit für sein Epos keine verschwendete Zeit: er hat eine faszinierend detailreich ausgearbeitete Welt erschaffen, kann diese phantastisch darstellen durch einen ausgezeichneten Schreibstil, der einen fesselt und direkt ins Geschehen versetzt. Eine Fülle liebevoll beschriebener Charaktere auf beiden Seiten der Kontrahenten haucht der Welt ihr Leben ein und lässt einen wirklich mitfiebern. Ein geniales Werk, das ich nur jedem wärmstens empfehlen kann. P.S. Meine Meinung zur deutschen Übersetzung, falls jemand gerne ein Beispiel hätte: "Empress Laseen" ist "Imperatrix Laseen". Also mal ehrlich: ich kannte das Wort erst, nachdem mir jemand gesagt hatte, dass es so tatsächlich im Duden stünde, aber wer sagt das schon? Ich hab noch nie was von Imperatrix Elisabeth oder so gehört, auch nicht von den Frauen der Kaiser im alten Rom, die in deutschen Geschichtsbüchern, man staune, Kaiserin genannt werden. Wie wärs damit gewesen? Oder eingedeutscht Imperatorin? "Quick Ben" wird zwar zu "Der schnelle Ben" (ja, der Artikel steht immer dabei, das klingt ganz toll und ich glaube nicht mal, dass mit quick in diesem Fall schnell gement ist), "Tattersail" aber wieder zu "Flickenseel". Was nun? Entweder ich übersetze alle Namen wörtlich oder lasse es ganz. Sail ist das Segel. Oder ist Seel jetzt wieder ein altdeutsches Wort für Segel? Muss ich dringend mal nachschauen... wahrscheinlich muss ich dankbar sein, dass "Anomander Rake" nicht zu "Anomander Kratzeisen" oder "Anomander Neigungswinkel" wurde. Wie wäre es mit Namen einfach stehen lassen und eine Fußnote mit Anmerkung zur wörtlichen Bedeutung, wie oft bei den Übersetzungen von Terry Pratchet geschehen, wenn etwas nicht so eindeutig mit einem Wort übersetzbar ist. Bei "Whiskeyjack", der mit "Elster" übersetzt wurde, könnte auch das Getränk eine Rolle spielen, so lange man nicht weiß, wie genau Whiskeyjack zu seinem Namen gekommen ist, der ihm von seinem Ausbilder beim Militär gegeben wurde, sollte man den Namen einfach so stehen lassen um die Doppeldeutigkeit zu erhalten (Whiskeyjack ist eine kleine Elsterart, was wohl keiner einfach auswendig weiß und erst die englische Wikipedia zu rate ziehen muss). Bei sechs Jahren wird Steven Erikson sich dabei bestimmt was gedacht haben.