CRS070D10CP 7" Continuous Rim Diamond Tile Blade for all types of ceramic tiles. Quarry, porcelain, stone, marble and granite tiles.

Blade was a little out of balance which caused more chip out than I wanted. I also did not realize the kerf was so big but that's probably on me. I had to hit every edge real hard with a diamond sander to fix them and some cuts would break out a corner at the end. But it was cheap and it came quick and my shower is done so, good enough.

What else to say? The blade fits the saw, cuts what I need it to, that’s about it.

The blade is fine. It’s good for the price. The only issue I had was that it threw sparks while cutting. When your material comes in contact with the black, it sends sparks everywhere. This seems to be the only blade that I have every owned (Out of about 80 blades), that threw so much spark. I’m giving it a half rating because of this.

I bought this to replace the cheap blade that came with a Ryobi Tile Saw because I had a couple of Backsplash projects that included Glass/Ceramic/Metal Mosaic tile - and BOY am I glad I did. The project went smoothly and the cuts were precise with almost no chip-out, etc (once You learn the pace this blade likes to cut at, that is - too fast and it will chip the tile). Instead of popping the bucks for the Ryobi pump, I bought a fountain pump here on Amazon for $8.99 (see my other reviews) which works perfectly at about half-flow. The only reason I give 4 stars instead of 5 is that I have noticed the blade not cutting quite as well after both projects - this could be the composition of the mosaics I was cutting with it though. All in all, I am happy with the investment.

what is pictured here, is NOT what arrived..... The knock out bushing was/is not sufficient enough in thickness to allow this to fit my Qtep. I'll be able to make it work - but it will require an additional trip to the hardware store to buy a washer**UPDATE**Later the same day, I was able to get the bushing to fit correctly - so I've changed the stars to 4. The performance of the blade is good - but I can't tell about the durability. I've finished my tile project (backslash) and hopefully the last tile job I'll ever do - - - guess I'm going to sell all the tile tools an saw

I purchased this for my QEP bridge saw. I needed a glass blade, this was the best I was able to find. I was skeptical, as it is very inexpensive. It proved to be well worth the money. I have paid twice, if not three times this amount for half the quality in the blade. I will be buying another when this wears out. I was cutting 1/4" thick glass tiles. Very little chipping in the face, some blow out on the back, but was manageable and cleaned up easily with a honing stone. I made over 100 cuts, and it is still making them just as clean as the first cut. I am a contractor, so this will get put through its paces.

New Concord CRS100G10CP blade received is woefully out of balance and severely shakes my MK-101 saw (which does not even run at a high RPM to start with). Blade also has visible runout on the edge, which you can detect by eye by spinning the blade slowly by hand up against a bit of material. Cutting edge width is 0.112 inch, not 0.070 inch as described, compared to the brand name blade at . It does cut, but the vibration and runout means it is only cutting on a portion of the revolution. Cut edges of porcelain tile material have large chips all along the cut. I swapped the original MK Diamond brand blade back in to confirm I wasn't imagining this nasty behavior, and the old brand name blade is smooth and even. I didn't expect this cheaper blade to be flawless, but it isn't even capable of its basic task. You would think these things would be spun up and tested at the factory, but apparently it is up to us to find their defects the hard way. One grows weary of how unaccountable the online retailer (Amazon), third party sellers, and import manufacturers have become, for the most simple representations of what a product is supposed to be, and obviously isn't. "Just send it back for a refund" is not an answer.

Little thinner than I thought, but that was my fault. I didn't read description. But it still worked great!