The Anatomy of the State (LvMI)

“In the present more secular age, the divine right of the State has been supplemented by the invocation of a new god, Science. State rule is now proclaimed as being ultrascientific, as constituting planning by experts.’’Rothbard writing in 1974. He just . . . nailed it!“ But while “reason” is invoked more than in previous centuries, this is not the true reason of the individual and his exercise of free will; it is still collectivist and determinist, still implying holistic aggregates and coercive manipulation of passive subjects by their rulers.’’I find this insightful. The use of ‘reason’ has changed into ‘trust us’.“The increasing use of scientific jargon has permitted the State’s intellectuals to weave obscurantist apologia for State rule that would have only met with derision by the populace of a simpler age. A robber who justified his theft by saying that he really helped his victims, by his spending giving a boost to retail trade, would find few converts; but when this theory is clothed in Keynesian equations and impressive references to the “multiplier effect,” it unfortunately carries more conviction. And so the assault on common sense proceeds, each age performing the task in its own ways.’’Rothbard is just so much fun!I’m reminded of the story in book of Acts . . .“On a set day, Herod clothed himself with royal raiment and sat down on the judgment seat and began giving them a public address. Then the people who were assembled began shouting: “A god’s voice, and not a man’s!” Instantly the angel of Jehovah struck him, because he did not give the glory to God, and he was eaten up with worms and died.’’Now, this only occasion where angel acts against ruler directly. Maybe, at this beginning of Christianity, the lesson that political rulers are not gods, not to be worshipped, prepared Christians for the conflict with the Roman Empire.Rothbard explains something I’ve wondered . . .“The majority must be persuaded by ideology that their government is good, wise and, at least, inevitable, and certainly better than other conceivable alternatives. Promoting this ideology among the people is the vital social task of the “intellectuals.” For the masses of men do not create their own ideas, or indeed think through these ideas independently; they follow passively the ideas adopted and disseminated by the body of intellectuals. The intellectuals are, therefore, the “opinion-molders” in society. And since it is precisely a molding of opinion that the State most desperately needs, the basis for age-old alliance between the State and the intellectuals becomes clear.’’This alliance of intellectuals and politics makes sense for this reason. Obvious. Now.However . . .“It is evident that the State needs the intellectuals; it is not so evident why intellectuals need the State.’’Right.“Put simply, we may state that the intellectual’s livelihood in the free market is never too secure; for the intellectual must depend on the values and choices of the masses of his fellow men, and it is precisely characteristic of the masses that they are generally uninterested in intellectual matters.’’More and more this happening. Well . . .“The State, on the other hand, is willing to offer the intellectuals a secure and permanent berth in the State apparatus; and thus a secure income and the panoply of prestige. For the intellectuals will be handsomely rewarded for the important function they perform for the State rulers, of which group they now become a part.’’Intellectuals become rulers!He provides famous historical example . . .“The alliance between the State and the intellectuals was symbolized in the eager desire of professors at the University of Berlin in the nineteenth century to form the ‘intellectual bodyguard of the House of Hohenzollern.’”Worth remembering how this ‘alliance’ resulted in the German disasters of the twentieth century.ContentsWhat the State Is NotWhat the State IsHow the State Preserves ItselfHow the State Transcends Its LimitsWhat the State FearsHow States Relate to One AnotherHistory as a Race Between State Power and Social PowerOn dissent . . .“The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism; there is no better way to stifle that criticism than to attack any isolated voice, any raiser of new doubts, as a profane violator of the wisdom of his ancestors. Another potent ideological force is to deprecate the individual and exalt the collectivity of society. For since any given rule implies majority acceptance, any ideological danger to that rule can only start from one or a few independently-thinking individuals.’’Think of the Christian persecution by the Romans.“The new idea, much less the new critical idea, must needs begin as a small minority opinion; therefore, the State must nip the view in the bud by ridiculing any view that defies the opinions of the mass. “Listen only to your brothers” or “adjust to society” thus become ideological weapons for crushing individual dissent. By such measures, the masses will never learn of the nonexistence of their Emperor’s clothes.It is also important for the State to make its rule seem inevitable.’’These slices provide example of Rothbard’s style. Clear, trenchant, incisive and persuasive.For some. Others . . .This short work of 54 pages explains much.Undoubtedly can produce various reactions - joy/anger, relief/frustration, insight/rejection.Forty-four notes (linked)Excellent references!Index (not linked)

This is not a book on the organizations of government and who does what. It is a concise and cutting analysis of State power, and the governed that watch it grow more massive with each passing day.Rothbard begins quickly and builds on his premise that the State gains at the expense of the individual. He finds excellent examples to make a fine point. Here are two of my favorites:1. "Since most men tend to love their homeland, the identification of that land and its people with the State was a means of making natural patriotism work to the State's advantage."Consider how you might think about citizens of a country based on it's head of state. When the government identifies a "regime" that is opposed to it's well-being, we - the collective people - typically show our patriotism by supporting our government and policies that must be implemented to protect us.2. "We may test the hypothesis that the State is largely interested in protecting itself rather than its subjects by asking: which category of crimes does the State pursue and punish most intensely - those against private citizens or those against itself?"This got right to the point: the government looks out for itself, just like you look out for you and your family and property. The difference between the two is that the government has the ability to punish and expand its resources as it feels necessary. You, as an individual, do not.To sum up: if you are reading this, chances are you are looking to know more about political history and power, economics, or libertarian viewpoints in general. For any of these purposes, I think you would be wise to consider this 60 page book. It is a fast, intelligent read that will likely help you critically analyze other policies and political ideologies from the standpoint of the State vs. the people. This book is an overview and highlights the big picture; no background in economics or political science is necessary.

One of the best short book about the state. It's an all time favorite for American history teacher since it's short and very informal. It really makes you think about the philosophy behind the state.

I like to keep a couple copies handy to give away. I prefer the font in this one better than others I bought.

Sadly, MR has not been with us for several decades, but thankfully, his writings are a tremendous legacy for their clarity of thought and boundless wisdom. This work is recommended to new readers for its brevity, but it's not short on the power of its message. A society struggles with increases in government and its crony financial partnerships that rob the citizens.

I like that the essay had the references and relivent paragraphs included at the bottom of the page. It also left plenty of room to right notes and highlight in the book. Yes I'm one of those people.

"Anatomy of the State" by Murray Rothbrad is a bold attempt at unmasking the bureaucratic machine, an attempt which the author remarkably succeeds in.Quoting many leading scholars in the field, and at the same time appealing to the fundamental principles of common sense among his audience, Rothbard gets his point across in a clear and sound way. The state, he argues, is nothing more than a band of criminals that hold a monopoly on crime, including theft (taxes), and murder (military). Further, the author outlines various methods employed by the state to uphold its status of legitimacy and inevitability.This book, written by one of the most prominent opponents of governmental acquisition of power in the 20th century, is a an essential read for all liberty-loving independent citizens. It challenges the very notion of state as a necessary mean of self-determination of nations, and instead places the human being, with all his or her indelible rights, at the foundation and the top of society. It is a truly humanistic manifesto with a powerful message and a conversational tone.

I love this book, is simple to understand, its not so long and interesting. I love to have it on my personal library.

Exhibe una ideología neoclásica ramplona verdaderamente decepcionante. Un librito de tres páginas completamente inútil. Tirar el dinero.

Reißerisches Titelbild. Vernünftiger Inhalt.

Explains how state emerged, what it is and why we don't need it.

It very clearly and briefly reveals the workings underneath a State apparatus and asks a reader to think upon concepts of Social Power of humans over nature and State Power of Humans over other Humans. This was worth exploring deeper into Psychological realms of using Power or Force for Self Expansion and survival and it's consequences and molding of one's Psychological make up. Is there a way where even nature is not hurt by Humans ? Because even Social Power of using Nature, though natural, contains few seeds of Force. I am delving deeper into Question of when use of Force is Correct and when it is not.