I'll Be Gone in the Dark: One Woman's Obsessive Search for the Golden State Killer Paperback – February 26, 2019

I heard about this book a few years ago and kind of let it slip by. I continued seeing the cover on people's bookhauls and their most anticipated reads. My friend Penelope talked about it this year and how she really wanted to read it so I finally bought the book. Then of course I heard that it was on HBO as a docuseries and I needed to watch it, so I had to read the book first. 5 stars!! This book is phenomenally written. Let me tell you why.In my past I have read true-crime written by mostly men. They were absolute fact based, dry and to the point. Here's the killer, this is how he did it. It was procedure based and most of the time the true-crime was written by the detective who spent all his time with the madman, the killer. So I would go into these books expecting horrific facts and more of a textbook of this particular case and killer. Now....lets talk about the way Michelle wrote this book.Michelle McNamara has always wanted to be a writer. She absolutely has a way with words and its very soothing to read. She takes her time. She really captures the feel, the essence of what she is about to say. Not only was she a great writer, but she had a true-crime podcast that really honed in her skills and helped her shine when it came to killers. A lot of people "tuned" into her podcasts. She would talk about a new killer/ unsolved crime and humanize the story. Allowing the listeners/readers to be captured in the story and eager to find out more. It was like Michelle was telling you a scary bedtime story, but with real facts.Michelle spent a few years following EAR/ONS. EAR stands for East Area Rapist and ONS stands for Original Night Stalker. Those two acronyms are ugly and dull. Not that a killer/rapist needs a jazzy name. But....when it comes to awareness to the public? A catchy name helps keep the bad man close so that way people are still out looking for them. Michelle penned the name Golden State Killer. Her helpful, jazzy name for this very mysterious bad man helped bring more awareness to himself and the cold cases. People had forgot about him in America. Maybe not for the people who lived in the neighborhoods he prowled, but police stopped caring for the most part. People assumed he was dead. Once a killer stops killing....is there still a reason to look? Of course! But, we have new killers everyday. Sometimes those cold cases stay cold cases. Michelle however wanted....needed more. She felt a deep connection to this case (maybe because she was raped herself when she was younger). She kept the momentum alive to catch this guy.The book is broken up into 3 parts. Part one describes the different areas the rapist chose to pursue his victims. At first it was just peeping into their windows (he only ever attacked people in one -story homes), then he started raping. At first it was just girls when they were home alone, then he upped his game and started raping women while their spouses were home. Tying up the husband/boyfriend, while he raped the women. Eventually that was not enough thrill for him. After 50 rapes the Golden State Killer started killing his victims so there wouldn't be anymore witnesses to describe what he looked like. He ended up killing 10 people.Part two we follow Michelle on the ways she tried to help the detectives solve this case. She was apart of a forum exclusively working on solving this four decade long cold case. These public sleuths or civilian detectives really helped the police figure out different angles. They had everything mapped out. They cross referenced all the cases. Putting people with the similar attacks in the same boxes. Over the years they figured out that attacks that were not assumed was from EAR/ONS...really were the work of the same man. The section also talks about how the old detectives traced their findings through early DNA.Part three is the aftermath. This section was written after Michelle died. Her husband, along with the civilian detectives and real detectives helped finish this part of the book for her. They told their stories to the editor that put the rest of the book together. It's sad that Michelle didn't get to see how much she helped solve this case and how she effected the ones surrounding this case.The book as a whole was wonderfully written not only because Michelle has a way with words, but because she focused a lot on the victims. They weren't just some names on a sheet. They were and are, flesh and blood people. Their stories are important and Michelle in her own gracious way, told these stories to the masses. She allowed the victims privacy by not giving us their real name, but also by being so delicate with the way she told it. She didn't glamorize their unfortunate situation. She was trustworthy. The victims could feel that she only wanted to help, not get money off of their stories and so they told them. And she did a great job speaking for them.I'm at the point of rambling now. If you have never picked up a true-crime before, I'd pick this one up. It's written like fiction with all the emotional parts and like a non-fiction with all the technical parts. It's just so well written. Once you are done, go and watch the docuseries on HBO. It was directed so well. I just loved having the faces to the names that I read about in the book.

Although I was vaguely aware of the California rape and murder sprees of the 70s and 80s, for me the Golden State Killer was eclipsed by the Zodiac Killer, the Night Stalker, and other notorious predators of the era. So a few days ago when Joseph DeAngelo made headlines as the alleged rapist and murderer who had terrorized entire neighborhoods, I read about the details for the first time.As an amateur genetic genealogist, I was especially fascinated by the fact that a DNA match on GEDmatch -- a service I've used for years -- led to his undoing, raising all kinds of questions about confidentiality of DNA data and legal ramifications of allowing access. (Those who argue in favor of giving law enforcement the ability to use all available tools might want to remember that in this case, the alleged perpetrator was himself a police officer.)The sections of the book written by McNamara are polished and compelling. It's a challenge to recreate history and to stick to the facts while ensuring that the narrative remains fresh and sounds authentic, especially given the repetition inherent to a situation in which we read about the same violent acts being reenacted again and again. But that very repetition may hold the key to solving the mystery of the criminal's identity. If I'd read the book before DeAngelo was arrested, I would have been looking for clues on every page. DNA analysis was still pretty primitive only a few decades ago, and I might have guessed that current testing techniques could verify an identity, but not that the DNA itself would serve as the final puzzle piece. It was fortunate for law enforcement that DeAngelo's relatives had not only tested but had voluntarily uploaded the results to GEDmatch, a free utility for DNA puzzle-solvers.Back to the book. I found the story behind the story equally captivating, especially Michelle's description of her own obsession and her willingness to go above and beyond to seek out evidence, talk to witnesses, befriend detectives, and bring new perspectives to well-trodden investigations. Her husband's determination to complete her work only underscored the significance of her efforts, and the resulting patchwork, reflecting the input of multiple writers, may not be quite as crisp as you'd see with Ann Rule, but lends a unique character to I'll Be Gone.I don't usually read true crime -- I guess reality can be a little too overwhelming most of the time -- but I was so wrapped up in the story that when I woke up at 4 am today, I couldn't go back to sleep until I'd polished off the last 50 pages.As the legal system works to define the role of DNA in tracking down criminals, the story of the Golden State Killer will serve as a primary case in point. As Michelle's colleagues note near the end of the book, discussions of privacy and the Fourth Amendment "evoke the classic statement...in Jurassic Park: 'Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.'" Credit to Michelle for her contribution to this important discussion.

Me gustó mucho la serie, por eso compré el libro para mi mamá, la calidad de la cubierta no es muy buena, pero todo lo demás se ve bien.

Brilliant story, I could not put the book down. Amazing new writer and cannot wait for the next book

Thanks

This is one of those books that was too creepy to read by myself at night, but also so incredibly well researched and written that I couldn't put it down. It's a haunting quest for truth and justice -- a thirty-year-old search for the Golden State Killer. And if you like true crime reads, I'd definitely recommend it.

This is a very difficult book to rate. If you read it as is, it certainly is all over the place, feeling unfinished and in dire need of redacting. Knowing how it came together, I could easily understand why it felt this way. Yes, there are way too many character, the timelines are askew and it is difficult to find the thread that binds it all together. So far, I would rate it 2 stars.But knowing that the author passed away before it was finished, it gives a reason why it is this way. If you read this as a insight of what an obsessed woman does to get to her goal, the sacrifices she makes, the uncertainty that she is doing the right thing. Well that aspect of the book deserves a solid 5 stars. Is it what you would expect when reading a true crime? Probably not, but I believe it is good that readers of the genre get a reality check. The victims are real people, the police are real people and we the readers, get our entertainment out of it - like Gillian Flynn exactly describes in her introduction.I started to read the book after I saw the intriguing HBO show, and I wasn't disappointed, as the take on Mrs. McNamara own personal life and her obsession seemed more important to me than the actual mystery.If I could, I'd give the book both a 2 and a 5 star, depending on the chapters and the point of view. I've settled for 3.